Skip to content
CyberAudit CyberAudit
 Request a proposal

Advisory

IT Risk Register Development and Validation

A risk register is only useful if it drives decisions. We build registers that do — or independently test the one you already have to see whether it does.

Two engagement types

  • Development — you have no register, or one that has not been touched in two years. We build it from a structured risk identification exercise across your technology estate.
  • Independent validation — you have a register but the audit committee is not confident in it. We test whether it is complete, whether the scoring is consistent, whether treatment decisions were actually made, and whether residual risk acceptance was authorised by someone with the standing to accept it.

Common failures we find

  • Risks written as control gaps rather than as risks — "no firewall rule review" is a finding, not a risk.
  • Impact and likelihood scored on undefined scales, so a "4" means different things to different owners.
  • Every risk rated medium, because nobody wants to own a high.
  • Treatment decisions recorded as "mitigate" with no action, owner or date.
  • Residual risk accepted informally by the IT function rather than formally by the risk owner.
  • No linkage between the IT register and the enterprise risk register, so technology risk never reaches the board.

Scoring that means something

5432112345 Impact Likelihood
Scales calibrated to thresholds your business already recognises — not a generic 1 to 5.

How we score

We use defined, documented impact and likelihood scales calibrated to your organisation — financial thresholds you recognise, regulatory consequences that are real for your licence, and operational impacts expressed in terms your business already uses. Generic one-to-five scales with no anchoring produce numbers that cannot be compared or defended.

How the engagement runs

  1. 1

    Methodology

    Agree the risk taxonomy, scoring scales, appetite thresholds and escalation triggers.

  2. 2

    Identification

    Structured workshops plus review of incidents, audit findings, threat intelligence and change pipeline.

  3. 3

    Assessment

    Score inherent risk, evaluate control effectiveness, derive residual risk on a consistent basis.

  4. 4

    Treatment

    Agree treat, transfer, tolerate or terminate for each risk, with named owner and date.

  5. 5

    Governance

    Establish the review cadence, reporting format and escalation route to enterprise risk.

  6. 6

    Handover

    Train the owners so the register survives without us.

What you receive

Documented risk assessment methodology with calibrated scoring scales
Populated IT risk register with inherent and residual ratings
Control effectiveness assessment supporting each residual score
Treatment plan with named owners and target dates
Risk appetite statement and escalation thresholds
Reporting template and defined review cycle

Frequently asked questions

Fewer than most organisations think. A register with four hundred entries is a catalogue, not a management tool — nobody reviews it and nothing gets escalated. For most mid-sized organisations, twenty-five to sixty well-defined IT risks at the right level of abstraction is workable. Granular technical issues belong in a findings tracker, not the risk register.

It has to, or technology risk stays invisible to the board. We define the aggregation and escalation rules — which IT risks roll up, at what threshold, and into which enterprise risk category — so the link is explicit rather than assumed.

Related services

IT Governance & COBIT Information Systems Audit Virtual CISO (vCISO)

Related regulatory frameworks

SBP ETGRM (Pakistan)

Need an independent view?

Tell us the scope, the regulator and the deadline. We will come back with an approach, a team and a fee estimate.

Request a proposal
Top