Pakistan
IT Audit and Cyber Security Assurance in Lahore
Lahore combines an established corporate and manufacturing base with one of the country's largest technology and software export sectors. Those are two very different assurance profiles, and they need to be approached differently.
Two markets, two drivers
On one side sit the established groups — manufacturing, textiles, food, engineering, pharmaceuticals — many of them mid-way through replacing systems that have run the business for fifteen years. Here the assurance question is whether the control configuration in the new platform is sound, whether the migration preserved data integrity, and whether the segregation of duties design survived contact with a go-live deadline.
On the other sits the technology and software export sector. The driver there is almost never a regulator. It is an enterprise client in Europe, North America or the Gulf who will not sign until they see ISO 27001 certification, a current penetration test, and a completed security questionnaire.
These need different engagements, different evidence and different reports. A firm that offers the same package to both is not paying attention.
For manufacturers and corporate groups
- ERP pre-implementation review before cut-over, while findings can still change the outcome — configured application controls, role and authorisation design, data migration reconciliation, and the criteria on which go-live will be authorised.
- Post-implementation review three to six months after go-live, once a full period cycle has run and operating effectiveness can genuinely be tested.
- IT general controls audit supporting the external audit cycle, particularly where the auditor has already raised a deficiency.
- Segregation of duties analysis across the role design, tested for conflicting combinations before roles are provisioned rather than after.
- IT policies and procedures for organisations formalising governance for the first time, written to what the business can actually comply with.
ERP assurance, before and after cut-over
For software and services exporters
If your customers are outside Pakistan, what they ask for is fairly consistent: ISO 27001 certification, an annual penetration test, a completed security questionnaire, and increasingly a named person accountable for security.
The order matters more than most firms realise. A penetration test commissioned before basic access controls are fixed produces a report that damages the relationship you were trying to protect — you have now documented your weaknesses for a customer who was merely asking for reassurance. Fix the identity and access foundations first, then test, then certify.
- ISO 27001:2022 gap assessment and the independent internal audit the standard requires — which your implementation consultant cannot provide for a system they built.
- Penetration testing of applications, APIs and infrastructure, with an attestation letter suitable for sending to a customer.
- Secure source code review against OWASP ASVS, with a developer walkthrough that fixes considerably more than a document does.
- Virtual CISO for firms whose customers now require a named, contactable security owner but who cannot justify a full-time hire.
- Cloud security review for teams whose entire estate is in AWS, Azure or Google Cloud and has never been independently assessed.
The pattern we see in fast-grown technology firms
A company that built quickly to reach product-market fit typically arrives at its first serious assurance engagement with a small engineering team, heavy cloud dependency, minimal formal documentation and a customer deadline. The instinct is to buy tooling.
The more effective sequence is almost always: define the scope precisely, reduce it where legitimately possible, fix identity and access, then instrument monitoring. Tooling bought before that sequence tends to generate findings nobody has capacity to action.
We scope to that reality rather than issuing a report that assumes a control function you do not have and cannot staff before the deadline.
How engagements are delivered here
Onsite for walkthroughs, observation and closing; remote for documentation review and analysis. For ERP work the onsite proportion is higher, because configuration review and role testing are considerably faster sitting with the person who built it.
Related services
Related regulatory frameworks
Tell us what you are actually being asked for
Describe the situation rather than the service. Working out the right scope is part of what we do, and it costs nothing to ask.
Request a proposal